HomePlan

Phase 2 · Design and engineering · Step 2.2

Make the lift-vs-retrofit foundation decision

Take the structural engineer's assessment and pick a path: retrofit in place, lift and replace foundation, or lift + new ground floor. The decision shapes everything downstream — design, schedule, budget, and what the family does for housing during the build.

Who
Homeowner, Structural eng., Designer
How long
1-2 weeks
Cost
Free (decision) — affects construction cost by $50K-$150K
You end up with
Documented foundation strategy + updated rough cost band

What you're deciding

The foundation assessment from phase 1 gave you a recommendation. Now you decide. Three paths:

Option A — Retrofit in place

The existing foundation stays. The structural engineer designs reinforcement: new footings poured against existing, sister joists at the rim, retrofit anchor bolts, possibly new interior shear walls.

  • Construction time: 4–8 weeks of foundation work, then normal addition framing.
  • Cost adder: $25K–$75K vs. an addition on a sound foundation.
  • Family impact: house is unlivable during foundation work; mostly livable during the rest if you're sheltering in place.
  • Best for: sound poured-concrete foundations from ~1950 or later that need reinforcement but not replacement.

Option B — Lift and replace foundation

The house is jacked up 4–8 ft on cribbing, the existing foundation is demolished, a new foundation is poured, the house is dropped back.

  • Construction time: 8–14 weeks of foundation/lift work, then normal addition framing.
  • Cost adder: $80K–$150K vs. a sound-foundation addition.
  • Family impact: house is unusable for the entire foundation phase.
  • Best for: brick-and-mortar, rubble, or unreinforced concrete foundations; pre-1930 bungalows on poor soil.

Option C — Lift + new ground floor (or basement)

The house is lifted and a fully new ground floor is built underneath; the original house becomes the second floor; the addition becomes the third. End result is a three-story house with a brand-new ground floor.

  • Construction time: 6–10 months total.
  • Cost adder: $200K–$400K vs. a normal addition. Total project lands at $700K–$1M+.
  • Family impact: out of the house for the duration. No question.
  • Best for: owners who want to materially expand square footage, fix every system, and end up with a near-new house. Often makes more financial sense than tearing down and rebuilding.

How to choose

  1. Foundation condition. If the engineer flagged the foundation as "compromised," Option A is off the table.
  2. What the family wants. Option A finishes faster; Option B/C produce a fundamentally different house.
  3. Budget. Option C nearly doubles the project budget but also nearly doubles the finished square footage.
  4. What the lot can support. Some lots (slopes, environmental zones) make Option C impractical regardless of budget.

Document the decision

Write a one-page memo signed by you and the designer that states:

  • The chosen path (A / B / C).
  • The structural strategy (engineer's summary).
  • The rough cost band with the path adder included.
  • Move-out window expectation.
  • Constraints driving the choice (foundation condition, budget cap, family timing).

This memo gets attached to the design contract and shapes every downstream document.

Where this information came from